15 metrics for modern, semantic, task-oriented evaluation
Measures whether the generated answer addresses the specific question asked, not just related topics
Measures how relevant retrieved context chunks are to the user's query
Whether highest-ranked retrieved chunks are most relevant to the query
Percentage of all expected relevant context that was successfully retrieved
Measures the computational cost of processing each query
Measures customer satisfaction with LLM system responses
Measures the percentage of queries resolved without human intervention
Uses evaluator LLM with explicit rubrics to score subjective quality dimensions
Measures whether the output fully resolves the underlying user need (actionability, tone, focus)
Measures effectiveness of PII detection and redaction in outputs
Decomposes output into atomic claims, generates closed-ended questions, and verifies against context
Measures the time taken to generate a response from query to final output
Measures adherence to safety guidelines and prevention of harmful outputs
End-to-end success rate from full conversation trace to goal achievement
Agent calls expected tools with correct parameters and in proper sequence
Master AI evals with hands-on projects, real case studies, and production-ready templates. From failure taxonomy to CI/CD quality gates.